Free & Easy Returns
Free & Easy Returns
The Rigol DS1054Z and Hanmatek DOS1104 are two popular 4-channel digital storage oscilloscopes in the entry-to-mid-range category, often compared by hobbyists, students, and engineers deciding between a proven classic and a modern budget challenger. The Rigol DS1054Z (originally 50 MHz, hackable to 100 MHz) has been a bestseller for years thanks to its reliability and community support. The Hanmatek DOS1104 offers native 110 MHz bandwidth at a competitive price, making it an appealing alternative for those needing higher out-of-box performance.
This head-to-head comparison draws from real specs, user reviews (EEVblog, Reddit, YouTube tests), and community feedback to help you make an informed buying decision.
Â
Appearance and Build Quality Comparison
Both scopes feature a compact benchtop design with a 7-inch color TFT LCD (800x480 resolution) for clear waveform viewing.
The Rigol edges out in hand feel and long-term durability perception, while the Hanmatek is portable and space-efficient.
Core Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Rigol DS1054Z | Hanmatek DOS1104 |
|---|---|---|
| Bandwidth | 50 MHz (hackable to ~100 MHz) | 110 MHz native |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Real-time Sampling Rate | 1 GSa/s (single/dual); drops to 250 MSa/s (all 4 ch) | 1 GSa/s (interleaved; ~250 MSa/s all 4 ch) |
| Memory Depth | 12 Mpts standard (upgradable to 24 Mpts) | ~20K+ pts (shallower) |
| Waveform Capture Rate | Up to 30,000 wfms/s | Decent (up to ~50,000 in modes) |
| Triggering | Advanced (edge, pulse, video, serial with hacks) | Edge, pulse, video; stable |
| Additional Features | FFT, math, auto measurements, deep decode options (hacked) | FFT, math, persistence, basic measurements |
The Hanmatek starts with higher bandwidth for faster signals, but the Rigol's vastly deeper memory excels at capturing long transients or protocol data without losing detail.
Real-World Performance Comparison
In side-by-side tests (e.g., YouTube/EEVblog), Rigol often wins on polish and deep analysis, while Hanmatek shines for quick high-bandwidth scans.
Â
Pros and Cons Summary
Rigol DS1054Z Pros: Deeper memory (12-24 Mpts), mature firmware, excellent community support/hacks (bandwidth, serial decode), proven reliability, intuitive UI. Cons: Base 50 MHz (hack required for more), older design, higher price (~$350-460).
Hanmatek DOS1104 Pros: Native 110 MHz bandwidth, great value (often under $300), large screen, solid for multi-channel hobby/lab use. Cons: Shallower memory limits deep captures, UI quirks/annoyances, less polished triggering/noise performance.
Value for Money: Hanmatek wins pure bang-for-buck with higher native specs at lower cost. Rigol offers better long-term investment due to depth, ecosystem, and hackability.
Recommended Buying Scenarios
Budget under $300? Go Hanmatek. Willing to spend a bit more for polish and future-proofing? Rigol.
Conclusion & Buying Advice
Both are excellent 4-channel options, but the choice depends on your needs: Rigol for depth/reliability, Hanmatek for immediate performance/value. Many users own both and find them complementary.
For the Hanmatek DOS1104âstrong contender with native 110 MHzâcheck the official page for current deals: https://hanmatek.com/collections/benchtop-oscilloscope/products/hanmatek-dos1104-oscilloscope-portable-4-canaux-110mhz
Whichever you pick, you'll get capable 4-channel powerâhappy scoping!
{"one"=>"Seleccione 2 o 3 artÃculos para comparar", "other"=>"{{ count }} de 3 artÃculos seleccionados"}
Seleccione el primer artÃculo para comparar
Seleccione el segundo artÃculo para comparar
Seleccione el tercer elemento para comparar
Dejar un comentario